
http://qalo.com/collections/all/product ... one-ring-1

Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
A harem in the PAW perhaps? LOL! At $19.99 per wedding ring you could have a few.Stercutus wrote:This has made me reevaluate the "two is one; one is none" in regard to the spousal unit.
Go to the site and look at the colors. Others don't look as cheap as the camo.Doctorr Fabulous wrote:Man I wish they didn't look so cheap. I don't wear a ring, but if I did the idea of something not-metal is grand. I think I might prefer wood, though.
https://media.giphy.com/media/S5Og1JDtapkhq/giphy.gifmoab wrote:Go to the site and look at the colors. Others don't look as cheap as the camo.Doctorr Fabulous wrote:Man I wish they didn't look so cheap. I don't wear a ring, but if I did the idea of something not-metal is grand. I think I might prefer wood, though.
rubbish, not everyone will survive, some people will be left on their own not by bad planning but just by sheer bad luck.Stercutus wrote:This has made me reevaluate the "two is one; one is none" in regard to the spousal unit.
jamoni wrote:Zombie Squad, the things you have experience with scare me.
grumpyviking wrote:rubbish, not everyone will survive, some people will be left on their own not by bad planning but just by sheer bad luck.Stercutus wrote:This has made me reevaluate the "two is one; one is none" in regard to the spousal unit.
must be that American English again don't understand what you mean!!Stercutus wrote:
Yes, but the missus has already cast her vote. I can't seem to get a majority out of it no matter what I do.