It is currently Wed Jun 20, 2018 6:15 am

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7759 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 324  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:04 pm 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
It seems like every day there's someone new looking for advice on an AR15 build. It'd be nice if we didn't have 200 threads on "tell me what to put on my AR"/
I'm starting this thread for that purpose. Any questions you have about parts, tools, techniques, tacticoolness, etc, put it in here, and I'm sure we can get answers for you.
I'll start ;)
I'm building a poor man's SDMR.
So far I have a RRA lower with RRA parts kit.
I'm thinking about using an A1 buttstock, and putting an adjustable comb/butt on it.
Basically, I want to take the kydex sleeve from this:
adjustable comb
and put it on this:
adjustable butt.
This should give me a very low profile adjustable stock.
Does anyone see any problems with this plan? I know there are other options, like the magpull or the mako ssr25, but I really want this rifle to look pretty stock.
For the upper, I'm going to use a BCM 20" upper. I may eventually replace it with a custom upper w/ heavy barrel and picatinny gasblock, but for now it'll be the BCM.
I plan to use this handguard setup:
DPMS DCM free float handguards,
Something like these, but preferably in metal,
and a good bipod. Any problems or suggestions about this?
Not sure what glass or other optics I'll be running. For now I'll throw my Bushnell Sportsman on it, but I want something better. Planned use of this rifle is for shots between 100-600m. Any suggestions?

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 12:19 pm 
Offline
* * * * *
User avatar

Joined: Wed Oct 17, 2007 6:02 pm
Posts: 3153
Location: Colorado Springs-ish
I'd go for a free float sleeve so I could use whatever handguards I wanted. Me, I'd use that and MOE handguards (whenever they actually put out the rifle/middie length ones) and then use the rail sections you attach to the MOE guards to mount your accessories without having to do a fully railed free float tube.

Fo scopes I found a brand that really surprised me: "Redfield". Old american compaany bought by Leupold, and the scopes are still made in Oregon. Got one myself, but other than mounting the scope, checking eye relief/focus I haven't had it out yet. So I honestly can't give a recommendation beyond it being US made, and a hell of a lot less expensive than other scopes I was looking at. I'll try to do a review of it once I get out and put some rounds downrange with it on my Stevens.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:14 pm 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
That free float tube is just the ticket, and the reason I ask questions! Thanks!
As for the MOE handguards, Meh. I like the A2 style, I just want to be able to mount a bipod.

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 1:37 pm 
Offline
* * * * *

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:27 am
Posts: 9333
Location: Seattle, WA
jamoni wrote:
That free float tube is just the ticket, and the reason I ask questions! Thanks!
As for the MOE handguards, Meh. I like the A2 style, I just want to be able to mount a bipod.

I would actually use something a bit different for the bi-pod mount if you are going to mount it to the tube. I switched over to FF-rail tubes for my rifles that I plan to DMR, but I have these angled sections for regular plastic handguards. I can give them to you if you want to pay for shipping.

_________________
Thanks Anianna!
Image

12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:
I say when Wee Drop visits the US, we make her ride a goat. You know, like those little monkey cowboys they have at some rodeos. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 2:14 pm 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
nimdabew wrote:
jamoni wrote:
That free float tube is just the ticket, and the reason I ask questions! Thanks!
As for the MOE handguards, Meh. I like the A2 style, I just want to be able to mount a bipod.

I would actually use something a bit different for the bi-pod mount if you are going to mount it to the tube. I switched over to FF-rail tubes for my rifles that I plan to DMR, but I have these angled sections for regular plastic handguards. I can give them to you if you want to pay for shipping.

That's a definite possibility. So they are rails angled to match the taper of the stock handguards?

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:04 pm 
Offline
* * *

Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 332
I wonder how steady that comb will be when attached to a telescoping stock bit like that, especially it being a rubber one that you are screwing the comb riser into. I'd look into something like the "accuriser"

Image

_________________
My intelligence insults itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:22 pm 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
Hmm. It may be a little unstable, at that.
However, the one you posted is ugly as shit. :)
However, I wasn't planning on screwing it into rubber. I was going to drill and tap the metal part.
Now that I look at it, though, neither the kydex nor the adjustable butt is what you'd call difficult to make. I may just whip up something in the machine shop that's better.

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:28 pm 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
http://www.tactical-life.com/online/pro ... 2-monopod/
The SEXY.

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:32 pm 
Offline
* * *

Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 332
jamoni wrote:
However, the one you posted is ugly as shit. :)

But functional, stable, and easily removable.

Also, the one you posted may not go far forward enough, if you like having your nose within 3" of the charging handle.

_________________
My intelligence insults itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:33 pm 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
Come to think of it, an adjustable butt is overkill. I'm the only one who will be shooting this thing, so it should be enough to use spacers to get the right length of pull, and the adjustable comb for height.
Hell, on third thought, I should probably wait to see how it indexes with a standard stock. Since I don't have a carry handle, it might just work out....

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 28, 2010 3:59 pm 
Offline
* * *

Joined: Sat Aug 05, 2006 10:50 am
Posts: 332
Quote:
Planned use of this rifle is for shots between 100-600m. Any suggestions?


I hear good things about the super-sniper 10x scope for the price and for that range. If you're really punching paper, and group sizes are the ultimate goal (with expensive ammo) you'll prolly want more magnification.
This is where a 30mm scope and 1/4moa adjustments are important - they'll give you more adjustment range. (fixed zoom also has more adjustment range) I found out that my nifty nikon buckmaster I have 6-18x with 1/8moa adjustments will run out of adjustment before I run out of range (when lobbing big 75 grain bullets at extreme range.) There are ways around this, with scope bases and rings that will include some downward slope. I'd get a ballistic calculator, run some loads, and make sure the scope's adjustment range fits the drop you'll see. And remember that the zero may not be at the center of the scope - leave some extra range.

_________________
My intelligence insults itself.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:19 am 
Offline
*

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:57 pm
Posts: 86
So, I've got a 16" barrel on my carbine. Carbine-length gas system, regular collapsible M4 stock, etc. My main goal is to keep the rifle as lightweight as possible yet make it the ultimate SHTF rifle for me. The problem is, I'm rather tall and have long arms, and so I seem to be having a little trouble with the shorter rifle. Even with my stock completely extended, I still feel like my support arm needs to be further along the handguards. This is what led me to trying out different types of grips. I've tried using the magwell, A2 handguards, quad rail system, quad rails with a vert grip, etc. All these different ways, I would move my hand around in different positions that I've noticed people use and try to find the most comfortable for me. So, I feel best with a vert grip, or atleast as best as I can figure out on my own.

I'm running MOE handguards on the rifle, and I'm wanting to add on a vert grip and flashlight. I'm in need of advice on a good vert grip/flashlight combo. I'm not talking about a vert grip and flashlight all in one, but just a combo of products that people have tried before and really liked. Keep in mind, I'm trying to keep it lightweight.

I was suggested a tango down vert with an offset mount and a Surefire light. I liked the set up, but then I started noticing that people are really talking about this Magpul "AFG". It's new, of course a lot of people are going to go out and buy it, try it out, etc. But, is it -really- that good? I mean, is it some revolutionary piece that's going to change the way people hold their AR-15? What I'm asking is, would one suggest it for me? Considering I can't find a comfortable grip with anything else due to my long arms. If someone does suggest the AFG, could you also suggest a good light setup to use with the AFG and MOE handguards.


Thanks ahead of time.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 11:50 am 
Offline
* * * * *
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jan 17, 2005 2:28 pm
Posts: 3568
Location: Louisville, KY
IAmKalashnikov wrote:
So, I've got a 16" barrel on my carbine. Carbine-length gas system, regular collapsible M4 stock, etc. My main goal is to keep the rifle as lightweight as possible yet make it the ultimate SHTF rifle for me. The problem is, I'm rather tall and have long arms, and so I seem to be having a little trouble with the shorter rifle. Even with my stock completely extended, I still feel like my support arm needs to be further along the handguards. This is what led me to trying out different types of grips. I've tried using the magwell, A2 handguards, quad rail system, quad rails with a vert grip, etc. All these different ways, I would move my hand around in different positions that I've noticed people use and try to find the most comfortable for me. So, I feel best with a vert grip, or atleast as best as I can figure out on my own.

I'm running MOE handguards on the rifle, and I'm wanting to add on a vert grip and flashlight. I'm in need of advice on a good vert grip/flashlight combo. I'm not talking about a vert grip and flashlight all in one, but just a combo of products that people have tried before and really liked. Keep in mind, I'm trying to keep it lightweight.

I was suggested a tango down vert with an offset mount and a Surefire light. I liked the set up, but then I started noticing that people are really talking about this Magpul "AFG". It's new, of course a lot of people are going to go out and buy it, try it out, etc. But, is it -really- that good? I mean, is it some revolutionary piece that's going to change the way people hold their AR-15? What I'm asking is, would one suggest it for me? Considering I can't find a comfortable grip with anything else due to my long arms. If someone does suggest the AFG, could you also suggest a good light setup to use with the AFG and MOE handguards.


Thanks ahead of time.


My thoughts on the AFG:

http://zombiehunters.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=56502

In short, I DO NOT like them on 7" carbine-length handguards or rails. I just don't think there's enough room to get the AFG forward enough to work properly. On a 9" or longer handguard they work great! I'll add that I'm a fairly small guy with average length arms. if you have long arms I see this being even more of a problem.

I think your best bet would be to try a longer rail that extends past the front sight base, like one of the Daniel Defense FSP models. This would allow you to grip farther forward.

_________________
"Now, let us gather our strength from the violence of the elements!" - Captain Terror


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 9:55 pm 
Offline
*

Joined: Sat Sep 26, 2009 6:57 pm
Posts: 86
Civilian Scout wrote:
IAmKalashnikov wrote:
So, I've got a 16" barrel on my carbine. Carbine-length gas system, regular collapsible M4 stock, etc. My main goal is to keep the rifle as lightweight as possible yet make it the ultimate SHTF rifle for me. The problem is, I'm rather tall and have long arms, and so I seem to be having a little trouble with the shorter rifle. Even with my stock completely extended, I still feel like my support arm needs to be further along the handguards. This is what led me to trying out different types of grips. I've tried using the magwell, A2 handguards, quad rail system, quad rails with a vert grip, etc. All these different ways, I would move my hand around in different positions that I've noticed people use and try to find the most comfortable for me. So, I feel best with a vert grip, or atleast as best as I can figure out on my own.

I'm running MOE handguards on the rifle, and I'm wanting to add on a vert grip and flashlight. I'm in need of advice on a good vert grip/flashlight combo. I'm not talking about a vert grip and flashlight all in one, but just a combo of products that people have tried before and really liked. Keep in mind, I'm trying to keep it lightweight.

I was suggested a tango down vert with an offset mount and a Surefire light. I liked the set up, but then I started noticing that people are really talking about this Magpul "AFG". It's new, of course a lot of people are going to go out and buy it, try it out, etc. But, is it -really- that good? I mean, is it some revolutionary piece that's going to change the way people hold their AR-15? What I'm asking is, would one suggest it for me? Considering I can't find a comfortable grip with anything else due to my long arms. If someone does suggest the AFG, could you also suggest a good light setup to use with the AFG and MOE handguards.


Thanks ahead of time.


My thoughts on the AFG:

http://zombiehunters.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=16&t=56502

In short, I DO NOT like them on 7" carbine-length handguards or rails. I just don't think there's enough room to get the AFG forward enough to work properly. On a 9" or longer handguard they work great! I'll add that I'm a fairly small guy with average length arms. if you have long arms I see this being even more of a problem.

I think your best bet would be to try a longer rail that extends past the front sight base, like one of the Daniel Defense FSP models. This would allow you to grip farther forward.



That's the problem. I'm not really trying to disassemble the upper, and also I want to keep it lightweight. If I went with a DD FSp or something, I'd have to swap over to free float and do some work to my AR that I don't really want to attempt. The only gunsmith around won't touch AR-15's.Thanks for the advice, I considered the FSP but wasn't too sure about install.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Mon Mar 01, 2010 10:09 pm 
Offline
* * * * *
User avatar

Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:38 am
Posts: 4274
Location: Mesa, AZ
IAmKalashnikov you could get a Magpul stock and then put a butpad on it. That should give you a bit more LOP than a standard AR stock. Oh and can we make this a sticky!

_________________
Image

Why must all the hoops be on fire?


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 12:15 am 
Offline
* * * * *

Joined: Fri Aug 29, 2008 8:27 am
Posts: 9333
Location: Seattle, WA
jamoni wrote:
That's a definite possibility. So they are rails angled to match the taper of the stock handguards?

Yessir. I have a picture of the gun with the rails on a carbine around here somewhere....

ETA: Here it is. The rail si backwards in this pick I think, but with standard round handguards with the taper, it *should* be level.

Image

_________________
Thanks Anianna!
Image

12_Gauge_Chimp wrote:
I say when Wee Drop visits the US, we make her ride a goat. You know, like those little monkey cowboys they have at some rodeos. :lol:


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:05 am 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
Awesome. I think I WOULD like those. Drop me a PM and we'll figure out the shipping and whatnot.

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:15 am 
Offline
* * * * *
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 02, 2008 3:34 pm
Posts: 3847
Location: Spring,TX
I don't know if I missed how much you want to spend on a glass but these are awesome high quality low priced. I have the 4-14x mounted on a larue mount for my SDM set up. 1/2 MOA adjustments and a 55gr BDC. Clear crisp and beautiful just like you would expect.
http://www.leupold.com/tactical/product ... -3-9x40mm/

Image

_________________
sigboy40 wrote:
I carry around magical kit faeries that keep all my stuff in place. This way I dont lose anything.


Instructor at Milcopp Tactical

CEO of http://movementtocontact.com/index.html

Please also like us on Facebook!


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 7:25 am 
Offline
ZS Member
ZS Member
User avatar

Joined: Wed Apr 21, 2004 6:50 pm
Posts: 14985
Location: st louis
gravediggerfour wrote:
I don't know if I missed how much you want to spend on a glass but these are awesome high quality low priced. I have the 4-14x mounted on a larue mount for my SDM set up. 1/2 MOA adjustments and a 55gr BDC. Clear crisp and beautiful just like you would expect.
http://www.leupold.com/tactical/product ... -3-9x40mm/

Image

For glass, I'm going to see how it shoots with my Bushnell, accurize as much as I can, then adjust my price accordingly. If I can make this thing a real tack driver, then I'll get the best I can.
Will definitly be looking at Leupolds.

_________________
JoergS wrote:
Realistically, I think I can launch a nine pound chain saw at 50 fps from a shoulder mounted rubber powered bazooka...

squinty wrote:
I reserve the right to yell "Dookyhole!" - or it's Hebrew equivalent if such a thing exists - whilst dispensing a barrage of palm strikes at my opponent.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 9:41 am 
Offline
* * *
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 15, 2008 1:00 pm
Posts: 302
Location: SE Michigan
I like the idea of the help thread. Because I have a few simple questions that I wouldn't want to start a thead with. I'm not real familar with building an AR but I like the idea of buying it in complete halves since some companies do uppers better and some lowers better and I can also save a little money doing it this way.

I'm not really looking to mess with putting on handguards, stocks, rails and everything myself I'd rather just buy it in complete halves.

So, my question is with a limited budget where should I spend my money to get good quality on the Upper or on the Lower? So in essence which is better to have good parts.


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:15 pm 
Offline
* * * * *

Joined: Wed Jul 01, 2009 9:27 am
Posts: 1870
Snapcat wrote:

So, my question is with a limited budget where should I spend my money to get good quality on the Upper



BCM is the general consensus it would seem.

_________________
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 1:58 pm 
Offline
*

Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2010 4:29 am
Posts: 54
...

_________________
"One should either write ruthlessly what one believes to be the truth, or else shut up." - Arthur Koestler


Last edited by Maxfield on Thu Dec 16, 2010 5:36 am, edited 2 times in total.

Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 6:20 pm 
Offline
* * * * *
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 20, 2007 3:54 pm
Posts: 1077
Location: Someplace new
As long as I'm already signed in for the day, and this thread is here....
What are everyones thoughts on lower parts kits? Are there any significant differences in quality from one company to another, or will I be getting the same basic setup from everyone selling?

_________________
Disclaimer: *Throwbacks opinions are just his opinions. They are based on the best facts he has to hand, and sometimes in spite of them. It is possible for two intelligent people to disagree, and sometimes both of them are right.*
Image


Top
 Profile  
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 10:14 pm 
Offline
*

Joined: Mon Nov 30, 2009 4:22 pm
Posts: 77
Location: Northeast Ohio
what are some good websites that I can find parts?
Should I get a stripped lower? Or can I get a complete lower? If the first are there different types that are better?

Also, I found a lower with the bolt carrier group, etc...in the description it said the bolt was auto...does that mean it fires full auto?


Top
 Profile  
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 7759 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 324  Next

All times are UTC - 6 hours [ DST ]


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group