Moderator: ZS Global Moderators


Krustofski wrote:Dude, you're an open system which has energy pumped into it at least once a day. Entropy doesn't stand a chance. Plus, all living things are thermodynamically unstable anyway, we're held together by pure kinetics. You're not special. Um... what I'm trying to say is: Happy Birthday.

duodecima wrote:This got discussed a bit when the US switched from analogue to digital a few years back. (Is that why your analogue transmitters are going?)
1) With analogue, when the signal gets weak (at the edge of its radius, or in a shadow) it just gets fuzzy, but you can still get some picture and sound (frequently not enjoyable for movies, but you could get the gist of what was going on, data wise) With digital, when the signal gets weak, you get nothing. This means some folks out on the edges of a broadcast area couldn't get as many channels as they had before.
2) With analogue, emergency radios could at least pick up the SOUND from TV stations, which in an emergency would give you a lot of data also. I am told you might still be able to pick up the audio from TV IF you can plug a digital converter box (from the TV) into your emergency radio. I confess to having No Idea how I would do that for my emergency radio.

vyadmirer wrote:Call me the paranoid type, but remember I'm on a post apocalyptic website prepared for zombies.


BullOnParade wrote:I should note, that my BOL is my parent's home, and the HAM radios are not mine, buy my stepdad's. I do not have HAM credentials, or any experience with the radios.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Tater Raider wrote:BullOnParade wrote:I should note, that my BOL is my parent's home, and the HAM radios are not mine, buy my stepdad's. I do not have HAM credentials, or any experience with the radios.
You'd have to look up the channel to see what frequency they broadcast audio on, then just tune to that freq. and you get to listen to TV on your radio.



raptor wrote:I bought one of these instead of a portable digital TV. I simply plug it into the USB port of my laptop and it will run for about 2 hours before my laptop needs to charge the battery. It can plug into an external antenna.
http://www.hauppauge.com/site/products/data_hvr850.html


crypto wrote:Digital TV uses the same frequencies as the old NTSC analog TV signal.


KJ4VOV wrote:crypto wrote:Digital TV uses the same frequencies as the old NTSC analog TV signal.
Technically true but somewhat misleading. They are using the same frequency bands but for the most part have been shifted to different parts of those bands.
Also, I'm curious about the two portable TV's you suggested... why did you change your mind about the first and recommend the second? Looking at the first I see it's a well recognized and respected brand, has a built-in stand which the second does not, uses a detachable (thus replaceable) antenna, and is almost $10 cheaper.
KJ4VOV wrote:crypto wrote:Digital TV uses the same frequencies as the old NTSC analog TV signal.
Technically true but somewhat misleading. They are using the same frequency bands but for the most part have been shifted to different parts of those bands.
Also, I'm curious about the two portable TV's you suggested... why did you change your mind about the first and recommend the second? Looking at the first I see it's a well recognized and respected brand, has a built-in stand which the second does not, uses a detachable (thus replaceable) antenna, and is almost $10 cheaper.

crypto wrote:KJ4VOV wrote:crypto wrote:Digital TV uses the same frequencies as the old NTSC analog TV signal.
Technically true but somewhat misleading. They are using the same frequency bands but for the most part have been shifted to different parts of those bands.
Also, I'm curious about the two portable TV's you suggested... why did you change your mind about the first and recommend the second? Looking at the first I see it's a well recognized and respected brand, has a built-in stand which the second does not, uses a detachable (thus replaceable) antenna, and is almost $10 cheaper.
I think you got the links out of order, maybe? I changed from the first (digital prism) to the second (RCA) for all of those reasons.
The coax F connector on the RCA is what really sold it for me.


Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

BullOnParade wrote:What are others relying on as far as televised information in a disaster?
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.


Users browsing this forum: jonagik and 7 guests