Moderators: phil_in_cs, ZS Global Moderators
Doc Torr wrote:"Those who live by the sword get shot by those who see them coming a hundred yards away."
roscoe wrote:.....and don't plan on being The Humongous - it ain't happening.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Tater Raider wrote:I personally think Isreal is a good judge of what's going on and has the intelligence assets to monitor.
Doc Torr wrote:"Those who live by the sword get shot by those who see them coming a hundred yards away."
roscoe wrote:.....and don't plan on being The Humongous - it ain't happening.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Tater Raider wrote:I personally think Isreal is a good judge of what's going on and has the intelligence assets to monitor.

landser wrote:I think you are missing some things asset wise. Almost a year ago six U.S. submarines headed to the gulf each carrying 212 Tomahawks and the potential to carry 200 special warfare operatives.

the_alias wrote:Tater Raider wrote:I personally think Isreal is a good judge of what's going on and has the intelligence assets to monitor.
I disagree with you massively on this.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

raptor wrote:landser wrote:I think you are missing some things asset wise. Almost a year ago six U.S. submarines headed to the gulf each carrying 212 Tomahawks and the potential to carry 200 special warfare operatives.
You got a source for this? Typically what the US does is NOT broadcast where their submarines go. Stealth is the whole purpose behind using a submarine as a war fighting asset. Saying where they are going defeats the whole purpose behind this.
The Los Angeles Clas submarines typically list a torpedo load out of 26 tube launched weapons and a VLS system for 12 missles. Obviously under EWO conditions this storage would likely be expanded but considering that Tomahawks are roughly the same size as typical torpedo, I find that count of 212 each may be a stretch. Also if they were going to deploy 200 SEALS stealth would be required.
The US would not not likely send an Ohio class SLBM since in fact if we anted to use those they could likely engage an Iranian target anywhere within a 5,000 mile radius of the target. No need for it to get close.
Finally on an unrelated subject, India is a large regional player with interests in the matter.
I would note that India and the US Navy are conducting a joint exercise in the Bay of Bengal this week. Naval exercises have been used as a cover for military operations and intimidation, but they have also been just that military exercises.
http://www.thehindu.com/news/national/a ... 284922.ece
Israeli TV report shows air force gearing up for Iran attack, says moment of truth is near: ‘IAF expects losses, and knows it can’t destroy entire Iranian program’
A major Israel TV station on Sunday night broadcast a detailed report on how Israel will go about attacking Iran’s nuclear facilities in the event that diplomacy and sanctions fail and Israel decides to carry out a military strike.
The report, screened on the main evening news of Channel 10, was remarkable both in terms of the access granted to the reporter, who said he had spent weeks with the pilots and other personnel he interviewed, and in the fact that his assessments on a strike were cleared by the military censor.
No order to strike is likely to be given before the P5+1 talks with Iran resume in May, the reporter, Alon Ben-David, said. “But the coming summer will not only be hot but tense.”
In the event that negotiations fail and the order is given for Israel to carry out an attack on Iranian nuclear facilities, “dozens if not more planes” will take part in the mission: attack and escort jets, tankers for mid-air refueling, electronic warfare planes and rescue helicopters, the report said.
Ben-David said the Israel Air Force “does not have the capacity to destroy the entire Iranian program.”

Blast wrote:Phil, seeing your name on a fresh post in this tread always makes me nervous bacause I know you have reliable, terrifying news.![]()
-Blast
The head of the Israeli military has said he does not think Iran will develop nuclear weapons.
Chief of Staff Lt Gen Benny Gantz made the statement in an interview with the Israeli newspaper, Haaretz.
He said Iran's Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, had not yet made the final decision whether to build a nuclear bomb.

JustInCase wrote:I caught the tale end of a radio news report about the possiblity of Iran building a missle base on some islands north of South America? Anyone hear of that or can confirm or deny said report?


Some updated news on Stuxnet. It appears, as some have suspected, that the US and Israel collaborated on the project.

The Telegraph wrote:Armada of British naval power massing in the Gulf as Israel prepares an Iran strike
An armada of US and British naval power is massing in the Persian Gulf in the belief that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s covert nuclear weapons programme.
Battleships, aircraft carriers, minesweepers and submarines from 25 nations are converging on the strategically important Strait of Hormuz in an unprecedented show of force as Israel and Iran move towards the brink of war.
Western leaders are convinced that Iran will retaliate to any attack by attempting to mine or blockade the shipping lane through which passes around 18 million barrels of oil every day, approximately 35 per cent of the world’s petroleum traded by sea.
A blockade would have a catastrophic effect on the fragile economies of Britain, Europe the United States and Japan, all of which rely heavily on oil and gas supplies from the Gulf.
The Strait of Hormuz is one of the world’s most congested international waterways. It is only 21 miles wide at its narrowest point and is bordered by the Iranian coast to the north and the United Arab Emirates to the south.
In preparation for any pre-emptive or retaliatory action by Iran, warships from more than 25 countries, including the United States, Britain, France, Saudi Arabia and the UAE, will today begin an annual 12-day exercise...
...The main naval exercise comes as President Barack Obama is scheduled to meet Benjamin Netanyahu, the Israeli prime minister, today to discuss the Iranian crisis.
Many within the Obama administration believe that Israel will launch a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s nuclear facilities before the US presidential elections, an act which would signal the failure of one of Washington’s key foreign policy objectives.
Both Downing Street and Washington hope that the show of force will demonstrate to Iran that Nato and the West will not allow President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the Iranian leader, to develop a nuclear armoury or close Hormuz.
Sir John Sawers, the head of MI6, the Secret Intelligence Service, reportedly met the Israeli prime minister and Ehud Barak, his defence secretary, two weeks ago in an attempt to avert military action against Iran.
But just last week Mr Netanyahu signalled that time for a negotiated settlement was running out when he said: “The world tells Israel 'Wait, there’s still time.’ And I say, 'Wait for what? Wait until when?’
“Those in the international community who refuse to put red lines before Iran don’t have a moral right to place a red light before Israel.”...(continued at link)
KentsOkay wrote:I immediately thought about calling 911, but once we got to the T stop and got her out of her jeans, things seemed to be going a lot better.

Iran could launch a pre-emptive strike on Israel if it was sure the Jewish state was preparing to attack it, a senior commander of its elite Revolutionary Guards was quoted as saying on Sunday.
Amir Ali Hajizadeh, a brigadier general in the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, made the comments to Iran's state-run Arabic language Al-Alam television.
"Iran will not start any war but it could launch a pre-emptive attack if it was sure that the enemies are putting the final touches to attack it," Al-Alam said, paraphrasing the military commander.
Hajizadeh said any attack on Iranian soil could trigger "World War Three".

Return to Disasters in Current Events
Users browsing this forum: Brock Meatstone and 1 guest