The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Items to keep you alive in the event you must evacuate: discussions of basic Survival Kits commonly called "Bug Out Bags" or "Go Bags"

Moderators: Woods Walker, ZS Global Moderators

The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:17 pm

Ever since I posted my interest in loading out with ACU gear. It spurned a hotly debated issue I didn't know existed. ACU seems to be hated by most in the military. Simply for it's lack of camoflauge in some environments. And the lack of wear in it's pants. Unfortunately on that recommendation alone it gets thrown out of everyone else's load out.

It's clogged up a lot of other threads. (My apologies to the guy just looking for some pants. We didn't mean to hijack your thread. But we did...) So here are my arguments put forth in one thread - only about ACU. So for or against. Post your points here.

It's got to be more interesting than cloaks eh? ;) (I'm kidding. I guess if you can choose to wear a cloak. I can choose to wear ACU. LOL!)

Here's what I wrote in my other thread about ACU:

"I agree with you, Onpoint. If your walking the roads. You might as well fit in. And I plan to wear a mix of civilian and military gear until I can get to scrub/trees (read - civilian garb and a military backpack). Once your in the scrub (I'm traveling thru Los Angeles and then up the coast i.e. - dried out scrub/sage brush etc.) If your traveling with arms I don't think what your wearing is going to make much difference. Your an "armed combatant" at that point. No one is going to notice what your wearing. They're going to be stopped by the fact that your walking around with a battle rifle strapped to your chest. Although I hope to be able pack my foldable AK. Should the need arise to blend in and not stand out carrying an assault rifle around. The general public's term (assault rifle - read scary. LOL!) not mine.

Also for some of us ACU gear (not the uniform I understand it sucks - I'm talking field gear i.e. - packs, flc, sleeping bags, tents - the expensive stuff) can be had at a very attractive price point. I picked up an ACU MOLLE II pack for $30 in trade. And an ACU FLC with pouches for $20. And a bunch of misc. pouches for 5 bucks each. A sleeping system for $50. A complete camelbak for $15. And a tent for $65. All MOLLE II stuff. Not civilian/airsoft. A far cry from ALICE quality IMHO. And the same price if not far less. I couldn't imagine getting the same gear in civilian issue at that price. And at that quality. There is just to much of it around to not consider it as at least "part" of your gear.

Granted some of those deals will be hard to replicate. But I would not have been able to do that had ACU not been the vast majority of surplus that is out there. And the vast majority of ACU can be had for almost what you'd spend on Alice. And MOLLE II certainly is a step up from Alice. I humped Alice. And she ain't pretty. ;)

To try to do the same with Marpat is out of reach for many of us. (And I'm a diehard thrift finding Jarhead. LOL! I tried hard to make marpat work for the price.) But just the marpat backpack is $175 at best. More like $200. The cold weather gear is unfindable in my size (3xl). And at a premium. A couple hundred for each top and bottom IIRC. And Yes. I will save up for a marpat pack. But until I can afford the complete set of marpat stuff - which will run you many hundreds of dollars (if not into the $1500 to $2000 range for a full set up - pack, tac vest, cold weather gear, tent, pouches, fanny pack etc. etc.) - I will take advantage of being able to put together a milsurp outfit for just a few hundred. Which I think is far better. Than to sit around with nothing for 9 months while I wait to save up the money.

I got my first ACU item in this week. A camelbak. And I agree ACU is not the best camo pattern out there. It's akin to the lighter USMC (not sure if they had this in the other services) woodland ripstop of the late 70's early 80's. That I wore. It's not grey like most of the pictures on the internet would have you believe. It's green. Albiet a much lighter green than one would want. But a far cry from civilian solid black or solid green or solid coyote brown. I would argue that I could hide a lot easier with ACU than with those solid colors. Or worse in civilian gear - bright blues, reds, yellows etc. etc.

But for me it comes down to what I simply can and can not afford. I can't afford to sit around waiting for the time when I can afford marpat. Or even MOLLE II quality civilian gear in digital woodland. And even if I was just buying this stuff to hike or hunt in. I wouldn't pay the premium that is on marpat at the moment. I'm just cheap that way when it comes to my recreational activities. I have to much to spend elsewhere. A family to take care of. I can't justify dropping a couple grand on each persons set up. It's just not feasible.

I don't think anyone should poo poo ACU outright. Simply because it's not the best camo pattern out there. It has it's place. It's price point. And if your trying to put a BOB or INCH bag together it's worth considering. And a great option for those that can only afford to spend a few hundred on each of their families base set up (And I have to buy for four.). ACU camo isn't as bad as civilian colors. And MOLLE II is a step up from Alice for very little more. I would encourage those looking for their first set up to consider ACU. It's the vast majority of surplus that is out there today. Affording you deals you aren't going to find elsewhere. IMHO it's a sweet spot between the best military tactical (marpat) and civilian issue colors. At a very low price point.

From an old cheap Jarhead.

I'll shut up and go back in my corner now. ;)"

In addition:

First of all let me say I am a former Marine. I was in a sniper platoon. So I have a fair amount of camouflage and concealment knowledge. And I obviously tried very hard to find better camo patterns like my Marine Corps Marpat or Multicam. As I agree that they are better patterns than ACU. (Although I don't particularly care for the prevalence of tan on all the straps on the marpat pack.) My gear is for a long term INCH bag. And my prefered method of travel is tactical but hidden. Not grey man.

So first, no one camo pattern works in three different areas of the US. Just like 3 different camo patterns won't work in ANY "one" area of the US.

So therefore I've chosen - number one - to go with "one" pattern of camo. Not two or three or a mix of civilian/military. As I believe this is rule number one with camo. Start somewhere with one pattern. And augment with local foliage as you go along. Otherwise your trying to cover up multiple pieces of gear at multiple different times. Which is impossible IMHO.

I've also chosen ACU as it works best on the first leg of my journey. I'm bugging out from Los Angeles up coastal CA - an urban to lighter grey/green environment. I also don't agree with grey man. As I am going to be carrying a rifle strapped to my chest. And I don't think anyone is going to notice what I am wearing. So civilian attire is out "for me". I also wanted something with cheap rugged military bulletproof-ness - as this is an INCH bag and needs to stay together - and again that I could find all in one pattern.

Secondly, ACU is affordable. Marpat/Multicam is not. I can't afford a complete camo set up (back pack, fighting vest, sleeping bags, tent, pouches, pants, shirts, cold weather pants and shirts, etc. etc.) for four people in anything like marpat or multicam. And I personally don't believe that you should be mixing up your camo. It simply will not work well in any one environment. (Have I said that yet? LOL!) I also have four people to outfit. And a lot of items can't even be found in the better camo patterns like marpat or multicam. And certainly not for what I could afford. The marpat pack alone is $200. Let alone all the asundry other pieces of gear that you need to have in camo.

I got my ACU rucksack for something less that $30 IIRC. Sleeping system for $40. Tent for $50. FLC for $20. And these are trade values. I didn't have to pay for any of it. Granted they are great deals. (But the price between ACU and Marpat is HUGE.) A friend of mine owns a surplus company. I own a gun parts company. And he gave me great deals. But that would not have been possible without the huge influx of every piece of gear imaginable in ACU from the Army. So at the prices I was able to obtain ACU - it was a no brainer for me.

Third, take a look at these two forum posts. And pictures below. ACU is hardly "hunters orange". Certainly not civilian solid colors. And far from "the worst camo pattern ever used in the field". It's actually akin to the late 70's early 80's lighter green, woodland camo, ripstop, USMC stuff I wore in the military. Augmented with local foliage. I think ACU is an acceptible base. Considering it's cost. And again, the fact that no one pattern works well in all environments. It is a nice compromise from say marpat.

http://www.snipershide.com/forum/ubbthr ... er=1337423

This is a guy that used dark green RIT dye and got a really nice OD camo look out of some ACU pouches.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2Iw2ly91DNY

These pics are just to illustrate that ACU is at least better camo than solid colors or civilian colors. And not a "terrible" camo to start out with. If you were to augment it with local foliage.

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

Image

ACU is currently the cheapest modern military equipment that is out there. Because it is the most plentiful. To poo poo it out of hand is to pass on what otherwise might be an affordable, bulletproof-military alternative. Try to buy a complete kit in marpat or multicam? Number one a lot of stuff simply isn't available in those patterns yet. And it is so limited in it's availability that it's usually far higher in price than any other military alternative.

Most people can't afford the latest civilian issue stuff. Nor the latest military issue stuff. But don't want to go all the way back to ALICE technology. ACU is a good alternative - between the three - current civilian camo, current military camo (marpat), and old ALICE gear. In fact I would argue that ACU is almost as cheap as ALICE if you look hard enough. You can get a normally priced ACU rucksack for $45 - about the cost of a large Alice pack.

So for me it came down to price. It was better than going grey man IMHO. And I did not want to mix my camo's into a soup that would not work in any one environment. But hopefully some day - as it becomes more available - I'll be able to afford outfitting four people with Marpat or Multicam.

But if you have any suggestions for alternate gear I am all ears. I'm just being a cheap bastard out of necessity. My decision was basically "this is better than civilian colored geared as I want to remain hidden." And "I can't afford the pattern I want. But at least it's camo to start with.".
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Kissing-Tom » Mon Mar 12, 2012 3:30 pm

Interesting! Good Photos!
In our reserve group, we look often new pattern. OK,..German Flecktarn works, in the summer in the wood, but in other seasons?
My personal favourite for all seasons, in the most terrains is Realtree AP. But it´s only my opinion.
But, back to the post. I´m also not convinced from ACU, but this picture disagree.

Very good! Beste Grüße, Tom!
Til Valhall!
User avatar
Kissing-Tom
*
 
Posts: 42
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2012 1:37 am
Location: Bavaria

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby cap6888 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:12 pm

Not for nothing, but it seems that your bottom line argument is the price. That is fine, you can score a ton of gear in ACU for cheap. If ACU is that that ugly, spray paint will help fix that.

Where did you find an ACU sleep system for $50? Is that a full MSS system? That is a great deal if you did.

Here is a USMC pack in MArpat for cheap....

http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/u ... x?a=529470

In the end, you have to get the gear that works for you, whether it is quality, color, or price.
User avatar
cap6888
* *
 
Posts: 264
Joined: Fri Feb 10, 2012 12:55 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby ninja-elbow » Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:19 pm

I like them pics and you have a good point Moab. I think you'll do all right with current ACU surplus gear up and down the I-5 corridor.
President ZSC011
Part Viking, Part Siamese
User avatar
ninja-elbow
ZS Global Moderator
ZS Global Moderator
 
Posts: 14082
Joined: Sun May 13, 2007 12:39 pm
Location: Portland, OR

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:22 pm

cap6888 wrote:Not for nothing, but it seems that your bottom line argument is the price. That is fine, you can score a ton of gear in ACU for cheap. If ACU is that that ugly, spray paint will help fix that.

Where did you find an ACU sleep system for $50? Is that a full MSS system? That is a great deal if you did.

Here is a USMC pack in MArpat for cheap....

http://www.sportsmansguide.com/net/cb/u ... x?a=529470

In the end, you have to get the gear that works for you, whether it is quality, color, or price.


That pack has no top and no waist belt. And with shipping I think you can find them cheaper on ebay. But still a good deal. The top and belt can be found on Ebay. But they are not cheap. There is one place selling the complete pack with new tops and complete with belt for $168. If you need the link I'll find it for you.

The problem is then you have to find all your other gear in Marpat i.e. tent, bag, camies, pouches, camelbak, cold weather gear, FLC etc. etc. (If your trying to get all your camo to match. Like I am.) And that is when it starts adding up. I wish I had saved all my prices when I was looking. It came out to way more than ACU. And some stuff I couldn't find as I'm a 3xl on top and 2xl long on bottom.

Ya. I got the MSS for $50. You can get them for $119 at Uncle Sams. I was amazed at how different the new stuff is to the old canvas bags. Wow what an upgrade. My friend gave me some screaming deals too. But even at retail ACU is still way less expensive. And there is a lot of aftermarket gear made in ACU. Not so much in Marpat yet.

I'm not sure how much marpat is going to come down though. The USMC is pretty small compared to the ARmy. Which means not nearly as much stuff gets dumped on the market. I think once the Army loads a new camo and it starts surplussing then your going to find good deals on better camo. Or as Multicam (isn't mulitcam the civilian version of Marpat or am I stoned?) gets more plentiful.
Last edited by moab on Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:39 pm, edited 1 time in total.
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:25 pm

ninja-elbow wrote:I like them pics and you have a good point Moab. I think you'll do all right with current ACU surplus gear up and down the I-5 corridor.


I think so. And thanks. I just don't want people to throw out ACU gear outright. Just because it's not "the" camo to have. It's still pretty good camo for what it is. And like I say the gear itself for the price is nonplus-ed.
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Kutter_0311 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 4:37 pm

I agree that ACU has certain benefits, like low cost and high availability. These are very positive for you as you want to get your gear put together quickly and at low cost. ACU is also not completely useless as a camo pattern. It works in a few spots. Lots of new, modern equipment can be had with little investment because the army was rather foolish with its choices.

On the down side, you're a Marine that will look six kinds of army, and that is unfortunate, though it may lead enemies to terminally underestimating that you can't shoot and aren't very aggressive.

My airsoft team ran a mix of ACU & MARPAT for a few months, and ACU took a lot more hits in the environments where we played. I was about to outfit everyone with MARPAT when our CO found multicam, and declared it our new official pattern. It took me a long time to fully change over, as I'm not rich, and have a family, but over time I was convinced. Multicam clearly performs better across more environments than MARPAT(which I also still use) and far, far better than ACU just about anywhere.

If you can upgrade over time, I encourage you to, but I certainly won't condemn you for using ACU. I have several items in the now-forgotten 'ranger green' because they were on sale, and I have yet to meet a ranger I haven't wanted to punch in the face...
JAYNE COBB wrote: Well, what you plan and what takes place ain't ever exactly been similar.
Image
TravisM.1 wrote:If a rifle is an option, a rifle is usually the answer.
minengr wrote:I've said it numerous times, a quality rig is only as good as it's weakest link. Which usually is the nut behind the butt.
User avatar
Kutter_0311
* * * * *
 
Posts: 5798
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:44 am
Location: Frozen Tundra, WI

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Canadian Guy » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:05 pm

A picture says a thousand words:
Vermont, US Mountain Ops training school in October:
Image

Image

Although it is fall there is still a lot of greens and browns which the CADPAT TW still blended in very well with versus the ACU which looked like whitish-gray blobs at a distance. Even our US Army instructors were surprised at how well the CADPAT TW worked and also knew how badly their ACU uniforms did ref: camoflauge and durability.

I know which cam I would be picking if I had a choice :D

A comparison of some other camo patterns (no ACU):
Image
User avatar
Canadian Guy
* * *
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:13 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:23 pm

Kutter_0311 wrote:I agree that ACU has certain benefits, like low cost and high availability. These are very positive for you as you want to get your gear put together quickly and at low cost. ACU is also not completely useless as a camo pattern. It works in a few spots. Lots of new, modern equipment can be had with little investment because the army was rather foolish with its choices.

On the down side, you're a Marine that will look six kinds of army, and that is unfortunate, though it may lead enemies to terminally underestimating that you can't shoot and aren't very aggressive.

My airsoft team ran a mix of ACU & MARPAT for a few months, and ACU took a lot more hits in the environments where we played. I was about to outfit everyone with MARPAT when our CO found multicam, and declared it our new official pattern. It took me a long time to fully change over, as I'm not rich, and have a family, but over time I was convinced. Multicam clearly performs better across more environments than MARPAT(which I also still use) and far, far better than ACU just about anywhere.

If you can upgrade over time, I encourage you to, but I certainly won't condemn you for using ACU. I have several items in the now-forgotten 'ranger green' because they were on sale, and I have yet to meet a ranger I haven't wanted to punch in the face...


"...though it may lead enemies to terminally underestimating that you can't shoot and aren't very aggressive."

LMAO!!! Preach it brother!

I will upgrade over time. Multicam is civilian right?
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 5:34 pm

Canadian Guy wrote:A picture says a thousand words:
Vermont, US Mountain Ops training school in October:
Image

Image

Although it is fall there is still a lot of greens and browns which the CADPAT TW still blended in very well with versus the ACU which looked like whitish-gray blobs at a distance. Even our US Army instructors were surprised at how well the CADPAT TW worked and also knew how badly their ACU uniforms did ref: camoflauge and durability.

I know which cam I would be picking if I had a choice :D

A comparison of some other camo patterns (no ACU):
Image


I want the bunny pink! where can I find an FLC in bunny pink?!!!!

That Cadpat is good looking stuff. Although I heard about 90% on the civilian market is actually from China. Another internet legend probably. I looked into it. But couldn't find my sizes! Im to god damn big I tell ya.

The pics are good. Although nothing like my AO. Southern cali beaches look more grey/sage brushy. But still. I hear you. ACU is not a great all around pattern. I would like to see the dark green RIT dyed ACU in those same pics. I think it would fair well. Very close in general green to the cadpat. But a little dirtier.

Anyone still wanting to camo up on the cheap take a look at that youtube video in the op. It's really not a bad color - camo wise or other. That other pic of a pair of ACU's dyed that is floating around this site is just to bright a green for me.

I think to the trained eye (someone that's been in the military in the grunts or better) that camo is really only going to be good for long distances. Movement is what is going to give you away. Unless your low crawling in a ghillie suit. And no one is bugging out in a low crawl in a ghillie suit. At least not for long distances.

Great pics Canadian guy. I'll try to find some more. And see if we can nail down where (if anyplace) ACU does work good. a lot of those pics above are like my AO though. Dry undergrowth.
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Canadian Guy » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:33 pm

moab wrote:I want the bunny pink! where can I find an FLC in bunny pink?!!!!

That Cadpat is good looking stuff. Although I heard about 90% on the civilian market is actually from China. Another internet legend probably. I looked into it. But couldn't find my sizes! Im to god damn big I tell ya.

The pics are good. Although nothing like my AO. Southern cali beaches look more grey/sage brushy. But still. I hear you. ACU is not a great all around pattern. I would like to see the dark green RIT dyed ACU in those same pics. I think it would fair well. Very close in general green to the cadpat. But a little dirtier.

Anyone still wanting to camo up on the cheap take a look at that youtube video in the op. It's really not a bad color - camo wise or other. That other pic of a pair of ACU's dyed that is floating around this site is just to bright a green for me.

I think to the trained eye (someone that's been in the military in the grunts or better) that camo is really only going to be good for long distances. Movement is what is going to give you away. Unless your low crawling in a ghillie suit. And no one is bugging out in a low crawl in a ghillie suit. At least not for long distances.

Great pics Canadian guy. I'll try to find some more. And see if we can nail down where (if anyplace) ACU does work good. a lot of those pics above are like my AO though. Dry undergrowth.


100% that movement is what you see first unless they're in blaze orange! The best option like you say is to have cam that matches your AO so CADPAT TW would not work well in a dry, arid region that's why CADPAT AR (arid regions) was developed. I'm sure Multicam would be a very good option for Southern California and its works very well up here in fall and spring. I do not know of Chinese made CADPAT BDU's but I'm sure they're out there :?

Another camo comparison:
Image

And more CADPAT :D
Image
User avatar
Canadian Guy
* * *
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:13 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby 74 or more » Mon Mar 12, 2012 6:53 pm

Very interesting thread. At the beginning my opinion of ACU completely changed but that when I got to Canadian Guy's post it when right back to not being a fan of ACU. Pictures don't lie but they do tell different stories apparently.
Montani Semper Liberi
"There is no bad Bourbon, only better Bourbon"
"If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go" -Mark Twain

My EDC/GHB
User avatar
74 or more
ZS Donor
ZS Donor
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:54 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Kutter_0311 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:00 pm

moab wrote:Multicam is civilian right?

Originally, yes, though designed for the military by Crye. Army had MultiCam vs ACU in the last stage of selection, and "chose ACU due to cost factors" and because the Marine Corps had already made a huge PR splash by rapidly fielding the two digital MARPAT patterns. MARPAT, BTW, is just modded CADPAT. The Corps saw something that worked, asked to borrow it, and had cammies ready to issue by the time they received permission. Add to that Marines' natural ability to appear on camera, and the army got scooped. They could have recovered the initiative by choosing MultiCam, but they have this knack for making overly cautious decisions and fucking themselves. Now, of course, they have chosen to fuck up MultiCam by not springing for matching camo webbing and velcro on their issued gear. Way to find the false economy, Big Army! :wink:
JAYNE COBB wrote: Well, what you plan and what takes place ain't ever exactly been similar.
Image
TravisM.1 wrote:If a rifle is an option, a rifle is usually the answer.
minengr wrote:I've said it numerous times, a quality rig is only as good as it's weakest link. Which usually is the nut behind the butt.
User avatar
Kutter_0311
* * * * *
 
Posts: 5798
Joined: Thu Jun 25, 2009 4:44 am
Location: Frozen Tundra, WI

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:15 pm

74_or_more wrote:Very interesting thread. At the beginning my opinion of ACU completely changed but that when I got to Canadian Guy's post it when right back to not being a fan of ACU. Pictures don't lie but they do tell different stories apparently.


I don't think it's a matter of either of our pictures lying. It's just that different camo works better in different environments. Canadian guys pics were taken in (I assume) Canada or some greener area of North America. Where things are greener than say southwest US. So Cadpat works better. As probably would multicam. The Afghan pic I posted is in the mountains of afghanistan. ACU doesn't work as well in the low lands. From what I've been told. But in that area it obviously worked well. Cadpat would have probably been to dark for there.

The point is that no one camo works everywhere in the US or the world. And a multitude of different camo patterns on yourself at once - won't work anywhere in the world.

So ACU is at least better than mixed up camo patterns or civilian colors. And is great gear for the price. There are many different AO's in the US. ACU is at least good in some of them. As my pics illustrate. But Cadpat is good in a multitude of places too. As shown in CG's pics. PRobably Multicam would work better than either. But again, it's expensive and hard to find in some gear.

Probably two thirds of the gear I see on ZS is a mix of either civilian gear (solid or bright colors) or camo or both. Therefore, in my humble opinion, ACU works at least better than two thirds of the kits out there. As far as camo goes.

IF your not looking at being the grey man. If you are. Then more power to you. Let the cloaks fly! LOL! Just kidding. :)
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby 74 or more » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:21 pm

moab wrote:I don't think it's a matter of either of our pictures lying. It's just that different camo works better in different environments.



I completely agree. i just did a terrible job of saying it haha. I'm by no means an expert. I simply thought ACU just stood out a lot. But obviously it just depends on the area
Montani Semper Liberi
"There is no bad Bourbon, only better Bourbon"
"If I cannot smoke cigars in heaven, I shall not go" -Mark Twain

My EDC/GHB
User avatar
74 or more
ZS Donor
ZS Donor
 
Posts: 596
Joined: Thu Feb 16, 2012 5:54 pm
Location: Alexandria, VA

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Kommander » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:42 pm

ITS Tactical ran a couple of rather comprehensive articles comparing different kinds of camos a few years ago. The first is here and the second is here. Be sure to look at the big pics. Personally I am a fan of Multicam and feel that while not useless the lack of a brown/tan color in ACU hinders it for use in the desert where I live. Honestly though the only camo I use anymore in a Multicam hat I got as a present and a desert DPM basha. The rest of my gear is either tan/coyote (got it on sale after a certain contractor was kicked out of Iraq) or black for work (security). Also just as an aside depending on the circumstances I would rather have a solid color that fit the environment than a camo pattern that did not.
MEAT WORLD MEAT DRAGON RIDER

Image

Why must all the hoops be on fire?
User avatar
Kommander
* * * * *
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:38 am
Location: Mesa, AZ

The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Shado67 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:44 pm

I like ACU. I'm in north Texas and I think ACU is perfect for the environment here. Again it's all field gear not BDUs.

I don't care what camo scheme you like. It all draws attention in an urban environment.

I notice the ACU stuff seems to be of a higher quality than the black or coyote versions.

MARPAT and multicam are too expensive.
Shado67
*
 
Posts: 36
Joined: Wed Sep 22, 2010 12:47 pm
Location: Lewisville, TX

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Kommander » Mon Mar 12, 2012 7:48 pm

Shado67 wrote:I notice the ACU stuff seems to be of a higher quality than the black or coyote versions.


That is odd. Items that are otherwise identical except for color should be of the same quality. Do you have a specific examples?
MEAT WORLD MEAT DRAGON RIDER

Image

Why must all the hoops be on fire?
User avatar
Kommander
* * * * *
 
Posts: 4085
Joined: Fri Oct 12, 2007 12:38 am
Location: Mesa, AZ

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby mmaiolo81 » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:38 pm

Kutter_0311 wrote: and I have yet to meet a ranger I haven't wanted to punch in the face...

No offense, but I haven't met a Ranger that hasn't wanted to punch a Marine in the face either...
User avatar
mmaiolo81
* *
 
Posts: 170
Joined: Wed May 11, 2011 11:34 pm
Location: Tampa, FL

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Mon Mar 12, 2012 8:47 pm

LMAO.
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Canadian Guy » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:03 pm

moab wrote:Canadian guys pics were taken in (I assume) Canada or some greener area of North America. Where things are greener than say southwest US. So Cadpat works better.


The first two pics were in Vermont at the US Army Mountain Warfare Training area, the "bunny" photo I do not know and the last one with the soldiers on patrol was most likely up north in Canada somewhere.

My vote is for Multicam as the best all rounder although it is a bit too tan for summer woodland environments but not bad. If I had a choice I would be wearing CADPAT TW for summer (green) woodland and Multicam for fall/spring. White of course for winter :D
User avatar
Canadian Guy
* * *
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:13 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby omega_man » Mon Mar 12, 2012 9:52 pm

While doing a SERE course awhile back, there was a mix of Marines wearing woodland MARPAT and Army mixed between ACUs and old Woodland (I call the old woodland and DCU analog cammies). This was jungle in Oki, and the fucking ACU stood out like a sore thumb! Thankfully, after a day of E & E, the ACUs started looking more like MARPAT due to filth. Before that, during my 1st deployment to IQ, one Army unit (wearing DCUs) was replaced by another wearing the brand-spanking new ACUs. Guess what? They stood out like a sore fucking thumb in Ramadi. Not a great place to be conspicuous in 2005. So, from my personal experience in different environments, ACU sucks. Sucks bad. Which is probably why the Army is replacing it. Hell, even Reserve guys are getting multicam issued for Afghan deployments.

Choosing an entire matching camo scheme for bug out purposes is silly enough; but, choosing a proven ineffective pattern for everything just because you can find some surplus M-16 mag pouches and helmet covers for cheaper (which, I've yet to see a huge variation b/t ACU stuff and woodland, DCU, OD gear etc.) is bordering on ridiculous. You're already not giving anyone the slip by wearing ACU, so what does it matter if your wearing a woodland pack, DCU canteen covers, and a coyote brown LBV?
"A thing is right when it tends to perserve the integrity, stability, and beauty of the biotic community. It is wrong when it tends otherwise.”
-Aldo Leopold, A Sand County Almanac

Buy my Stuff http://zombiehunters.org/forum/viewtopic.php?f=48&t=104048

Image
User avatar
omega_man
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1550
Joined: Tue Oct 12, 2010 2:35 pm
Location: all over South Carolina

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby Canadian Guy » Mon Mar 12, 2012 10:07 pm

omega_man wrote:While doing a SERE course awhile back, there was a mix of Marines wearing woodland MARPAT and Army mixed between ACUs and old Woodland (I call the old woodland and DCU analog cammies). This was jungle in Oki, and the fucking ACU stood out like a sore thumb! Thankfully, after a day of E & E, the ACUs started looking more like MARPAT due to filth. Before that, during my 1st deployment to IQ, one Army unit (wearing DCUs) was replaced by another wearing the brand-spanking new ACUs. Guess what? They stood out like a sore fucking thumb in Ramadi. Not a great place to be conspicuous in 2005. So, from my personal experience in different environments, ACU sucks. Sucks bad. Which is probably why the Army is replacing it. Hell, even Reserve guys are getting multicam issued for Afghan deployments.


Thanks omega_man, I didn't want to start an international incident so I went easy on ACU :D
User avatar
Canadian Guy
* * *
 
Posts: 314
Joined: Mon Nov 02, 2009 11:13 pm
Location: Canada

Re: The Great ACU Debate. (56K death!)

Postby moab » Tue Mar 13, 2012 12:04 am

omega_man wrote:While doing a SERE course awhile back, there was a mix of Marines wearing woodland MARPAT and Army mixed between ACUs and old Woodland (I call the old woodland and DCU analog cammies). This was jungle in Oki, and the fucking ACU stood out like a sore thumb! Thankfully, after a day of E & E, the ACUs started looking more like MARPAT due to filth. Before that, during my 1st deployment to IQ, one Army unit (wearing DCUs) was replaced by another wearing the brand-spanking new ACUs. Guess what? They stood out like a sore fucking thumb in Ramadi. Not a great place to be conspicuous in 2005. So, from my personal experience in different environments, ACU sucks. Sucks bad. Which is probably why the Army is replacing it. Hell, even Reserve guys are getting multicam issued for Afghan deployments.

Choosing an entire matching camo scheme for bug out purposes is silly enough; but, choosing a proven ineffective pattern for everything just because you can find some surplus M-16 mag pouches and helmet covers for cheaper (which, I've yet to see a huge variation b/t ACU stuff and woodland, DCU, OD gear etc.) is bordering on ridiculous. You're already not giving anyone the slip by wearing ACU, so what does it matter if your wearing a woodland pack, DCU canteen covers, and a coyote brown LBV?


I hear some frustration in your voice. You sound offended. I know what it's like to get issued crap gear. It sucks. I didn't mean to offend you.

"...after a day of E & E, the ACUs started looking more like MARPAT due to filth..."

This is sort of my point. By using a little engenutity one could make ACU at least better than civilian colors "in my AO". Whether it's with dye, dirt, vegetation or all of the above. In my AO (which is much like the photos I posted above) ACU is very similar to the natural vegetation. It shouldn't take much to make it fit in. Even if you look at that youtube video. The result looks better than solid OD. Which I'm sure you'd agree is not the best camo.

"Choosing an entire matching camo scheme for bug out purposes is silly enough..."

As stated earlier. This isn't for BO purposes. It's for INCH purposes.

And if you think camo is not suited for INCH purposes we have a fundamental disagreement that we probably won't bridge. I assume from this that you subcribe to grey man theory. So we agree to disagree.

"...choosing a proven ineffective pattern for everything just because you can find some surplus M-16 mag pouches and helmet covers for cheaper..."

Everything is cheaper in ACU. Although I haven't priced out M16 pouches or helmet covers. ;)

I have a family of four. It's all I can afford right now. Which I think is better than nothing. And better than the civilian equivilent in the same price catagory.

"You're already not giving anyone the slip by wearing ACU, so what does it matter if your wearing a woodland pack, DCU canteen covers, and a coyote brown LBV?"

My opinion differs. I think at distance your a lot more hidden with any kind of camoflauge other than civilian solids. Which again is my only real point. ACU has a niche. When you can't afford Marpat or find everything you need in it. And you don't want to be stuck with ALICE gear. ACU is your next best option.

But if we disagree on whether you should be in camoflauge or not - I don't think we're going to agree on this.

So I guess we agree to disagree. :)
www.legionarms.com
www.ultralightstove.com

"Ideas are more dangerous than guns. We don't let our people have guns. Why would we let them have ideas?" Josef Stalin

(Email is: moduspi@gmail.com)
User avatar
moab
ZS Member
ZS Member
 
Posts: 1184
Joined: Sun Feb 26, 2012 7:07 pm

Next

Return to Bug Out Gear

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: nathat, paul_c, Whoofit and 23 guests