Correct, it's an RCA. Now until I get the tuner in I decided to rig up just the single wire, but now I'm stumped. Here's what's going on.
On my RX320D with the AN200 loop antenna plugged in, I can *just* barely hear 9725 khz out of Lima Peru (using this frequency as an example). I mean, just barely. I plug in my random wire, I hear nothing on 9725. I unplug the random wire antenna and hold the RCA plug up to the built in antenna on my Grundig G3 portable, I get 9725 very clearly. I pull the RCA off the Grundig's antenna, 9725 becomes muddled with static, but I can still barely hear it.
So, this seems to indicate to my novice mind that the antenna is working somewhat, at least on the G3. The fact that I can pull in 9725 on the RX320D with the AN200 loop seems to indicate to me the RX320D is working, at least somewhat--though not nearly as well as my "cheaper" and supposedly less good G3. Odd, since I would think the expensive and very highly reviewed RX320D would get much better reception.
So, I can conclude one of two things (and tell me if I'm offbase here). First, the RX320D is screwed up somehow. In the alternative, the RX320D is somehow more finicky for some reason and needs something more precise in the realm of antennas that the G3 doesn't. This seems reasonable (again, to my novice mind), but it also seems somewhat backwards, given that one would think the cheaper portable would require more finesse to get good reception.
So, any thoughts on this?
P.S. Nobody ever told me this radio stuff would be so hard.
