Moderator: ZS Global Moderators
44Dave wrote:On 11 meters?
gary in ohio wrote:SSB is a modulation method and says nothing about the band/frequency your on. As noted it can be used on CB or on ham radio.
44Dave wrote:gary in ohio wrote:SSB is a modulation method and says nothing about the band/frequency your on. As noted it can be used on CB or on ham radio.
Given the list of radios the OP has, I'm pretty sure he's only interested in 11 meters.
Closer to on topic (but not quite), why don't more people here have SSB capable CBs? There seem to be a lot of ZS people who have no interest in getting an amateur license so why aren't they maximizing the capabilities they do have?
TacAir wrote:44Dave wrote:gary in ohio wrote:SSB is a modulation method and says nothing about the band/frequency your on. As noted it can be used on CB or on ham radio.
Given the list of radios the OP has, I'm pretty sure he's only interested in 11 meters.---being a truck driver dictated my radio interest, I'd like to get into HAM, but not sure of what a mobile (non-handheld) rig would cost me any ideas on where to start researching?
In contrast - a used White Mountain SSB rig will give you the same power, uses less power and has better sensitivity. Build it yourself and you know to fix it.----definitly gonna check this out.
Nothing against CBers, but that 'hobby' is all but dead. With the code requirement removed and a simple 35 question test as the only barrier, why not go with the Amateur Radio Service?
44Dave wrote:I snarfed a Uniden Washington from eBay specifically for the SSB capability. Haven't had a chance to get an antenna stuck up yet :/
I'm not sure why SSB isn't a standard for all rigs these days.
terminaltransco wrote:44Dave wrote:I snarfed a Uniden Washington from eBay specifically for the SSB capability. Haven't had a chance to get an antenna stuck up yet :/
I'm not sure why SSB isn't a standard for all rigs these days.
i agree, the only thing i can figure is the issue of stability? as in, AM is more stable? maybe someone with more experience can verify this, otherwise, yeah, why not just use the more efficient ssb? i dunno......those washingtons look nice, dont see much of those out here, seems galaxy and (stryker?) are the main units with SSB capability on the road.
TacAir wrote:I do see 10M SSB handhelds, it is unfortunate that they claim the 'bonus" feature of:
"actually can be set to one of 10 bands, which allows the radio to cover from 25.165 MHz to 29.695 Mhz in 10 kHz steps.
Pretty sure they are not type accepted for legal 11M operation.
Nothing against CBers, but that 'hobby' is all but dead. With the code requirement removed and a simple 35 question test as the only barrier, why not go with the Amateur Radio Service?

crypto wrote:TacAir wrote:I do see 10M SSB handhelds, it is unfortunate that they claim the 'bonus" feature of:
"actually can be set to one of 10 bands, which allows the radio to cover from 25.165 MHz to 29.695 Mhz in 10 kHz steps.
Pretty sure they are not type accepted for legal 11M operation.
If I'm allowed to scratch-build and operate a radio made out of spare parts and throw it in an altoid tin, as long as it operates correctly, do I even need type certification for amateur radio?
No, but you MUST meet the technical specifications to run on the bands today - you wil note that most kits talk about how the finished radio - if correctly tuned - will meet carrier suppression etc and that spurious emissions are below X - and so on.Nothing against CBers, but that 'hobby' is all but dead. With the code requirement removed and a simple 35 question test as the only barrier, why not go with the Amateur Radio Service?
I'd say that theres more likely more CB's sold in the US than amateur radios, to be honest. The road-faring segment of the public has one in every truck, and those of us that like to avoid speeding tickets like them too
Speaking as someone who uses 2m, GMRS, and 11m CB, I have to say that using amateur radio is my least favorite thing to do in the radio world. I don't like the technical and bureaucratic entry barrier that keeps me from handing a radio to a friend, I dont like the wide prohibitions on what speech is and isnt allowed on the bands, and I certainly don't like needing to transmit my name and home address before beginning every conversation.
I like amateur radio as a tool to get a job done, but really dislike it as a hobby. I have the Internet for when I want to hear strangers talk, and the internet has much more interesting conversations.
crypto wrote:TacAir wrote:I do see 10M SSB handhelds, it is unfortunate that they claim the 'bonus" feature of:
"actually can be set to one of 10 bands, which allows the radio to cover from 25.165 MHz to 29.695 Mhz in 10 kHz steps.
Pretty sure they are not type accepted for legal 11M operation.
If I'm allowed to scratch-build and operate a radio made out of spare parts and throw it in an altoid tin, as long as it operates correctly, do I even need type certification for amateur radio?

KJ4VOV wrote:crypto wrote:
As long as you're not trying to sell them commercially, no, you don't need your homebrew projects to be type accepted. But, as Tac-Air says, you still have to meet the technical specs.

CREEPER wrote:My new toy:
It's an RCI 2970N2 aka "the most "hated by HAMs" transceiver in the known universe.
Does it operate on 11m (CB)?
Yes. It does after a one minute mod.
Is that legal? No.
Will I care about legality if SHTF? No.
Do I use it to transmit on "true" HAM frequencies? No.
Why is it illegal? Simply because it'll do 200 watts on 12-10 meter and 11 meter's limit is friggin 4 watts.
Why am I posting this here? Beause I really dig 11m SSB. Mainly 27.385 LSB.
Am I working on my tech class so I can use 10m legally? Yes. I should be ready within the month.
Why did I choose such a "hated" radio? Because these are built to withstand the EXTREMELY harsh vibrations and jolts dealt by these CLASS 8 SEMIS. Yes, I'm a truck driver. They are also more easily repaired than lots of "brand A" HAM radios. Tough as nails. Period.
Was this a strange post? Yes
Did it help me make friends? Probably not.
Do I care? A little, yes.
CREEPER wrote:I got it at a "cb shop". It was $425 converted. He wanted to "peak and tune" it with his GOLDEN SCREWDRIVER, and I told him NO! I do NOT want the mod limiter cut! I do NOT want a "swing mod" put in it! He couldn't believe that I ONLY wanted it converted. He said "I can get more power out of it that way!". I still insisted it be left alone. I've had all those mods before and they sounded awful on SSB.
But I can assure you, sir, that if you EVER hear me between 28.300 to 28.500, I WILL be legal.

CitizenZ wrote:Actually its a good little 10 m radio, and maybe the single cheapest HF SSB radio with a real VFO. That's a legit HF radio. Till you use on the wrong freq's. The whole point of CB is that is' a low power/qrp band. One guy pumping out hundreds of watts ruins it for everyone else. The limit is 11 watts SSB not 4. Your radio is about 6- 8 times more powerfull than a legal CB. In theory you could use a legal radio and a great antenna and do better, and stay legal. Also good antennas improve reception by the same amount, 200 watt amps do nothing for reception. "You can't work 'em if you can't hear 'em."
In case it's not clear, it is illegal to use that on CB, regardless of power.

Users browsing this forum: roscoe and 5 guests