Moderator: ZS Global Moderators

KJ4VOV wrote:I'm not understanding what you mean about ham radio not being the kind of "message" you want to show people in her line of work.

nathat wrote:KJ4VOV wrote:I'm not understanding what you mean about ham radio not being the kind of "message" you want to show people in her line of work.
let's just say these are the type of people who will mention if there are not power locks/windows on a car, all seats aren't power seats...Guns are not to be seen...etc. Just a different type of "market" and I do not wish to have any chance for it to mess with my wife's career. I'm not saying they have valid concerns, but it is what it is at this point.
nathat wrote:BTW, on your home system what wattage are you using if you don't mind me asking, and are you using directional signal or what is your setup?

nathat wrote:*My best solution so far is 2 handheld HAM radios and using repeaters to communicate. If this is the best/only/most plausable solution I will just continue down this path.

KJ4VOV wrote:Will a lot of repeaters be down after a major disaster? Yes, that goes without dispute. Will it be an "overwhelming majority"? Perhaps, but I believe the repeaters most likely to be down after a major incident are the ones that don't get much use anyway. There should still be two or three in most areas that remain functional.
zommoz10 wrote:What is the terrain like in between you and your wife?
In other words, what is your elevation, what is your wife's elevation and what are the highest elevations in between the two of you?nathat wrote:*My best solution so far is 2 handheld HAM radios and using repeaters to communicate. If this is the best/only/most plausable solution I will just continue down this path.
No. And the overwhelming majority of repeaters will be offline after a disaster or other emergency. Even if a repeater has backup power, I would still plan for something else.
You can still use portables but you'll need to repeat them on your own. That's not as daunting as it may seem. But let's talk about obstructions before we explore that avenue.
gary in ohio wrote:KJ4VOV wrote:Will a lot of repeaters be down after a major disaster? Yes, that goes without dispute. Will it be an "overwhelming majority"? Perhaps, but I believe the repeaters most likely to be down after a major incident are the ones that don't get much use anyway. There should still be two or three in most areas that remain functional.
And those will be dedicated to emergency communications and calling your wife would not be emergency comms... Even if there are repeaters online I would not rely on them. They will be in use and unavailable for most.
nathat wrote:zommoz10 wrote:What is the terrain like in between you and your wife?
In other words, what is your elevation, what is your wife's elevation and what are the highest elevations in between the two of you?nathat wrote:*My best solution so far is 2 handheld HAM radios and using repeaters to communicate. If this is the best/only/most plausable solution I will just continue down this path.
No. And the overwhelming majority of repeaters will be offline after a disaster or other emergency. Even if a repeater has backup power, I would still plan for something else.
You can still use portables but you'll need to repeat them on your own. That's not as daunting as it may seem. But let's talk about obstructions before we explore that avenue.
There are some elevation changes from here to there (light rolling hills of GA) but the main problem is she will be in Atlanta with large buildings and structures. I'll need more info on "repeat them on your own" because I didn't realize this is even possible. If you're speaking of buying and registering our own repeaters...This is just getting expensive!

zommoz10 wrote:Is your home in between the two of you by any chance? If so you can use an 8900 as a base cross band repeater. For example if the home is in the middle, between the two of you, your wife can use 6m to get back into the base and spits out the signal on another band to make up the rest of the distance.
Bunsen wrote:Keep in mind that you still need to comply with the usual rules on repeaters if you do this, such as the requirement to have a means of shutting the thing off remotely if it's causing interference.
nathat wrote: In an emergancy, even if she doesn't have her ticket, she would be allowed to use it correct?
nathat wrote: In an emergancy, even if she doesn't have her ticket, she would be allowed to use it correct?

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 4 guests