Moderator: ZS Global Moderators

angelofwar wrote:As for secure comm, unless they have the skill to triangulate your position, which is very hard to do for normal people, try using codes...sure they can hear you, but do they know what the hell you're talking about? We keep small cards of all the code words we use and what they mean...easy to pick up after just a few uses. Consider having code words for: Vehicles, your base, fall-out shelter, BOL, Ammo, Food. And consider codes for "actions" as well. "Box of crayons = everyone back to base"; What about duress words? For your action codes and dures words, use words that won't be spoken during a normal conversation (giraffe, platypus, etc.). Also have a cipher set-up, so if you know your being listened to/tracked, you can get out simple words in an emergency. A=P, C=G, etc., and give them to the person at your base and your operator.
Oh, and as the saying goes, "We all know at least one 'tacitcal hand signal'" .I.
IIII/

Doc Torr wrote:angelofwar wrote:As for secure comm, unless they have the skill to triangulate your position, which is very hard to do for normal people, try using codes...sure they can hear you, but do they know what the hell you're talking about? We keep small cards of all the code words we use and what they mean...easy to pick up after just a few uses. Consider having code words for: Vehicles, your base, fall-out shelter, BOL, Ammo, Food. And consider codes for "actions" as well. "Box of crayons = everyone back to base"; What about duress words? For your action codes and dures words, use words that won't be spoken during a normal conversation (giraffe, platypus, etc.). Also have a cipher set-up, so if you know your being listened to/tracked, you can get out simple words in an emergency. A=P, C=G, etc., and give them to the person at your base and your operator.
Oh, and as the saying goes, "We all know at least one 'tacitcal hand signal'" .I.
IIII/
I thought coded radio transmissions were prohibited by the FCC?

Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

RadioShooter wrote:The military and other Federal government communications don't come under the FCC.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

North Force wrote:If you are in a combat situation, the hell with FCC rules.
You need to communicate any way you need to so that the outcome is in your favor.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Tater Raider wrote:North Force wrote:If you are in a combat situation, the hell with FCC rules.
You need to communicate any way you need to so that the outcome is in your favor.
If you are in a combat situation you need to communicate calmly and clearly or help ain't coming. This means plain language, open transmission, etc. so that the cavalry can come quickly. You also need someone listening on the other end. I suggest 911 on a cell phone - it covers a lot. Also, why are you in a combat situation? Get the hell out of there yesterday!
Police are phasing out monitoring channel 9 on CB, and I cannot think of another radio freq they monitor aside from their own dispatch radios and, unless you are in law enforcement, you have no business transmitting on one.
If you are military and talking combat you need to following training and ask yourself why you are discussing this on an unsecured forum.
Yes the thread got a tad off-topic. They do that. IMO this thread started off-topic because I cannot justify civilians playing soldier under any circumstances - you will get people killed. Defending yourself? Yes! Absolutely! Working in combat groups? Really? Even if it's a ZPAW, and I insist Z-Day will happen, civilians have no business going out and actively seeking combat.
Within the context of arranging meets and what-not though what I said above will work, before or after ZDay. And it has the advantage of maintaining security and being completely legal.
North Force wrote:In a Real SHTF, TEOWAWKI, or any other Zombie acronym - Never say Never, cause you really have no idea what may happen. You may or will not always be able to control when and where a "Combat" situation happens.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.


Doc Torr wrote:On combat comms: If you NEED a radio for combat comms, you're doing "combat" wrong. The only reason we use radios in combat nowadays is to coordinate support across distances of several hundred meters between adjacent elements, or call in air support. Learn hand signals, quit with the "to hell with the FCC" and illegal (federal laws, gents) stuff, and sit down and remember that you have a hell of a lot to learn before you start thinking about crypto and coded transmissions. If a squad reinforced (24 Marines+10 ANA, in this case) can attack, repel the enemy, and push to the edge of the AO without using comm gear while spread across a 900m distance, then THAT should be your focus long before you think about some PAW fantasy wherein you and J.W. Rawles team up to fight off the UN invasion.
Just my 2 cents.
Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

aa1pr wrote:I foresee an issue as to what band everyone & what exact frequency or frequencies will be used
how do you defeat a radio jammer though, this is used against most enemies now a days
if it ever does come down to a SHTF or TEOTWAWKI situation I think I would monitor and listen before giving away my position and possibly scarificing my supplies & safety

North Force wrote:If you and your family/group are fighting another to keep your home or garden in a SHTF situation - You are in Combat. And if you are using radios to coordinate people and you worry about what the FCC might think, you'll probably lose.

majorhavoc wrote:North Force wrote:If you and your family/group are fighting another to keep your home or garden in a SHTF situation - You are in Combat. And if you are using radios to coordinate people and you worry about what the FCC might think, you'll probably lose.
No, you're commiting a crime. I suggest you read the forum rules before you post again, NF.
North Force wrote:Well i suggest you go read the Trading With The Enemy Act, War Powers Act, Patriot Act's I & II, Military Commissions Act, NDAA, among others - and then go troll around to see how many of the threads on this forum are considered a Federal Crime. I think you will be busy. and it will help your post count.
If you can't see the truth behind my post in a SHTF "Combat"situation vs. just telling someone to go out and "Commit a Crime", that's your problem.
I would bet you will find somewhere that even bringing up the word combat is a "Crime". Will i also be naughty if i say that many will also swear over the air in a SHTF "Combat" situation? Its the truth and yet a Federal Violation.
Many Will Swear over the air waves in a SHTF "Combat" situation. There.
If that's just too much - the mods know where the ban button is.

Tater Raider wrote:Any other thoughts I might have on the matter don't belong on ZS.

Doc Torr wrote:aa1pr wrote:I foresee an issue as to what band everyone & what exact frequency or frequencies will be used
how do you defeat a radio jammer though, this is used against most enemies now a days
if it ever does come down to a SHTF or TEOTWAWKI situation I think I would monitor and listen before giving away my position and possibly scarificing my supplies & safety
Defeat a jammer? The FCC law prevent you from out-powering any decent jammer, so you figure out where it's coming from and move away from it.
This brings up a good question: any radio gurus wanna tell me what the legality is of building a jammer designed to attack unencrypted civilian bands? Mostly the motorola handy-talkies and the hand-held ham radios.
Doc Torr wrote:North Force wrote:Well i suggest you go read the Trading With The Enemy Act, War Powers Act, Patriot Act's I & II, Military Commissions Act, NDAA, among others - and then go troll around to see how many of the threads on this forum are considered a Federal Crime. I think you will be busy. and it will help your post count.
If you can't see the truth behind my post in a SHTF "Combat"situation vs. just telling someone to go out and "Commit a Crime", that's your problem.
I would bet you will find somewhere that even bringing up the word combat is a "Crime". Will i also be naughty if i say that many will also swear over the air in a SHTF "Combat" situation? Its the truth and yet a Federal Violation.
Many Will Swear over the air waves in a SHTF "Combat" situation. There.
If that's just too much - the mods know where the ban button is.
You might look into the truth of NOLA (repercussions of thinking that disasters=WROL) and what combat really is, as well as what combat really is. Since you asked for a ban, I'd suggest you go ahead and set up an accou nt at one of the many websites that do openly advertise and condone Conspiracy (that's a crime in and of itself) so you can cry about how bragging about your intent to break multiple Federal laws was not tolerated on a charity-based disaster prep and recovery forum. Troll less.
Now, back to the topic, and in a manner that doesn't violate those all important Federal laws.
Can someone explain why a radio, especially an encrypted radio that could likely be cracked within a day or two (unless you design crypto, and you think you're better than an organized military) for "combat" communications? I mean, legitimately, I have never needed a radio unless it was to call in reports (only needed in an organized, supplied military with air support and adjacent units to worry about) to call in air support (see above) or when we had multiple adjacent units that were within gunshot-range but not necessarily coordinating (again, really only a problem for organized military.) Most of my combat experience was spent talking as little on the radio as possible.
North Force wrote:majorhavoc wrote:North Force wrote:If you and your family/group are fighting another to keep your home or garden in a SHTF situation - You are in Combat. And if you are using radios to coordinate people and you worry about what the FCC might think, you'll probably lose.
No, you're commiting a crime. I suggest you read the forum rules before you post again, NF.
Well i suggest you go read the Trading With The Enemy Act, War Powers Act, Patriot Act's I & II, Military Commissions Act, NDAA, among others - and then go troll around to see how many of the threads on this forum are considered a Federal Crime. I think you will be busy. and it will help your post count.
If you can't see the truth behind my post in a SHTF "Combat"situation vs. just telling someone to go out and "Commit a Crime", that's your problem.
I would bet you will find somewhere that even bringing up the word combat is a "Crime". Will i also be naughty if i say that many will also swear over the air in a SHTF "Combat" situation? Its the truth and yet a Federal Violation.
Many Will Swear over the air waves in a SHTF "Combat" situation. There.
If that's just too much - the mods know where the ban button is.

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 5 guests