Moderators: phil_in_cs, ZS Global Moderators
Mr. E. Monkey wrote:Wee drop is NOT a dinosaur with a mind-control hat. Wee drop is NOT a dinosaur with a mind-control hat...
goofygurl wrote:Wee is a fire breathing dragon???


Mr. E. Monkey wrote:Wee drop is NOT a dinosaur with a mind-control hat. Wee drop is NOT a dinosaur with a mind-control hat...
goofygurl wrote:Wee is a fire breathing dragon???



Liff wrote:Prepare for the future means learning from the past, right? I am shocked at the sheer number of people who have been lost by one person. How can we prevent this in the future? My thoughts below. No judgements, just thoughts. I hesitate to post this because I kinda don't want to post in this thread, because any thread seems callous under the recent past. I am honestly sick to my stomach now thinking about the past 48 hours. that said, I wish someone else posted this before I did, I am sorry if it offends.
On Wednesday of last week, a buddy and me were discussing what would happen if someone who had any training or experience were to do this. He said it happened once, Charles Whitman in Texas. That guy had a brain tumor, which may have caused him to go crazy. One of the issues that kept the number lost in that situation is civilian riflemen were shooting back at him alongside the police. That would never happen today, but this action meant that Charles Whitman could only shoot out of the drain holes for the observation tower, which dramatically lessened his ability to kill.
The guy in Tucson (forgot his name) was tackled as he was trying to reload, which dramatically lessened his ability to kill.
I have no idea what happened on that island, I do not pretend to know what happened on that island. "Fight back" is as best as I can word this. No judgement toward anything other than from a planning/preparedness point of view, fight back. It seems like this is the best option for a gunman. Half of prepared is to have a plan, what is your plan if this happens next to you? What plans worked well in the past?
I am not trying to advocate anything other than identifying trends and encouraging people to have a plan.


Jeriah wrote:But when everyone does the safest thing, you get a body count of 80 kids. I'm not judging anyone nor saying what I would or could do in the situation, just observing that these situations only end when someone sucks it up and takes a major risk with their life to stop the guy. (That, or he kills enough people that he decides he's done and takes his own life. But that's not really a "win" for anybody.)
Vampire wrote:Norway is great. Just sit on a deserted mountaintop, and if a zombie happens to stumble upon you trow rocks at him until he rolls all the way down.

Mad_Maxx wrote:One and a half hour response time from the police. Shows how "safe" you are with the norwegian police. I know for a fact that if something criminal happens where i live, outside of office hours, it will take a few hours for the police to arrive.... But that doesnt mean youre allowed to defend yourself, oh no, that would be unfair to the poor criminals

sealegs wrote:I make it my business to never be caught w. my pants down, and IF I am, then the size of my junk and the fortitude of my stones will give me the initiative by sheer intimidation alone.![]()

Makarov wrote:I've had a few thoughts about the reaction of those on the island, and I've talked about this at work today. The biggest thing here is that these were mostly kids. They were not ready for this, because no one in Norway expected that this could happen.
I've trained Krav Maga. That system was made to train everyone, from kids to the elderly, for a situation similar to this. It's a system based on a persons fight/flight-response, where the situation your in decide. I honestly don't know what I would have done if I've been there.
Anyways, media reports of several acts of heroics where done at the island. I saw a interview of with a young man who gave first aid under fire, they also talked about one boy who swam across to the mainland towing his injured friend.
Livejournal moment:
This shit has hit close for me, as I mentioned I spent my youth in that organization, and attended 2 summercamps there(actually met my first "real" girlfriend there). I don't think I know any of those that were killed or injured, but I might know their parents. I'm fucking numb.
And lest not forget the bomb in Oslo. So far I've found none of my friends affected by the bomb, but one buddy tells that his wife has several co-workers who were injured(and maybe killed). Fortunately they're on vacation, so his wife were not there.
/Livejournal
Lastly, as I mentioned earlier: This is an attack on the Norwegian Democracy as a whole, and our job now will be to make sure that Norway will continue to be a open, free democracy. We must make sure that people can continue to enjoy the freedom of speech, and the freedom to be a member of any political party(be it left or right) without fear.

The man asked to address the group, and then started shooting. According to police, the gunman was active and shooting for an hour and a half before authorities arrived. He used at least one automatic weapon and one handgun, police said.
An elite police unit took the gunman into custody on the island, Sponheim said. The man did not put up a fight during his arrest.


Rev wrote:They keep saying "automatic weapon". Are we talking a semi auto rifle or a full auto weapon?

sealegs wrote:I make it my business to never be caught w. my pants down, and IF I am, then the size of my junk and the fortitude of my stones will give me the initiative by sheer intimidation alone.![]()


Jeriah wrote:Liff wrote:Prepare for the future means learning from the past, right? I am shocked at the sheer number of people who have been lost by one person. How can we prevent this in the future? My thoughts below. No judgements, just thoughts. I hesitate to post this because I kinda don't want to post in this thread, because any thread seems callous under the recent past. I am honestly sick to my stomach now thinking about the past 48 hours. that said, I wish someone else posted this before I did, I am sorry if it offends.
On Wednesday of last week, a buddy and me were discussing what would happen if someone who had any training or experience were to do this. He said it happened once, Charles Whitman in Texas. That guy had a brain tumor, which may have caused him to go crazy. One of the issues that kept the number lost in that situation is civilian riflemen were shooting back at him alongside the police. That would never happen today, but this action meant that Charles Whitman could only shoot out of the drain holes for the observation tower, which dramatically lessened his ability to kill.
The guy in Tucson (forgot his name) was tackled as he was trying to reload, which dramatically lessened his ability to kill.
I have no idea what happened on that island, I do not pretend to know what happened on that island. "Fight back" is as best as I can word this. No judgement toward anything other than from a planning/preparedness point of view, fight back. It seems like this is the best option for a gunman. Half of prepared is to have a plan, what is your plan if this happens next to you? What plans worked well in the past?
I am not trying to advocate anything other than identifying trends and encouraging people to have a plan.
This is, in general, what I try to think about every time I hear a story like this, and it happens all too often. Sometimes playing dead works (heard one of the kids from the island on NPR this morning say he survived by playing dead), as can running, or hiding. Depending on the circumstances, you might play dead (for example if you're in a middle of an open area surrounded by corpses and he's 25 yards away, watching the field with a loaded weapon), you might run (for example if he is actively firing at you), or you might hide (if you think you can do so without being found). I think the important thing is to allow the situation to dictate your course of action, rather than being so one-track that you do the same thing all the time, even if it's wrong for the situation.
In general, though, I think the right answer is to do the thing that's easy to say on the Internet, and tough as hell to actually do: suck it up and try to find a way to take the guy out. If you're carrying a concealed weapon, you've got an edge, but another option is to take cover, and watch the guy until he has to reload (yes, you're watching him kill people, and yes, that sucks), then rush him and hope he hasn't trained emergency reloads. The Tueller Drill works both ways, remember. This is, unfortunately, a good way to get yourself killed; running or hiding is much safer. But when everyone does the safest thing, you get a body count of 80 kids. I'm not judging anyone nor saying what I would or could do in the situation, just observing that these situations only end when someone sucks it up and takes a major risk with their life to stop the guy. (That, or he kills enough people that he decides he's done and takes his own life. But that's not really a "win" for anybody.)
sheldor wrote:That is a ruger mini 14.

sealegs wrote:I make it my business to never be caught w. my pants down, and IF I am, then the size of my junk and the fortitude of my stones will give me the initiative by sheer intimidation alone.![]()

A.C.E. wrote:sheldor wrote:That is a ruger mini 14.
I stand corrected. I guess i didn't look very carefully at it, I just saw the massive heap of tacticool junk and thought "that what ppl do to ARs".
Speaking about tacticool shit, isn't that vfg mounted way to far forward?
0122358 wrote:so we moved a thread to maintain OPSEC on a fictional vid game so our team doesnt get kill as easily by possible spies...fuckin sweet


Return to Disasters in Current Events
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 3 guests